August 12, 2008 2M Amp Back
The 2M amp was mailed to TE systems on Aug 4th. Unit was received by TE Friday, repaired the same day and shipped back. Unit was received Aug 12. Bypass relay was installed and manual bias circuit was installed. It was determined that the transistors had been stressed, but still had substantial life remaining. Power was measured at 130watts out with 25watts in on 144.960MHz. Normal spec would be 160watts with this input. KB6JST changed the connectors from SO-239 to Type N-Female prior to shipment to TE. Unit was replaced into the fan tray and will installed shortly at DHS.
Jim KB6JST
July 24, 2008 Hardware upgrade
Pursuant to reports of inadequate cabling inside the band modules, KB6JST and W6KAP removed the two meter module after first measuring 21 watts output and 61 watts out of the amplifier. Inside the module were semi-rigid one-tenth inch fully shielded cables that their manufacturer rated at .4 db per meter at 400 mHz. We replaced the cables with quarter inch superflex and then measured 22 watts from the module and 65 watts from the amp. Having made a very modest improvement on two meters, we decided to open the 440 module. We found instead of the semi-rigid low loss cable, two pieces of RG-58A/U. We replaced those with quarter inch superflex. Power out of the module increased from 24 watts to 26 watts
Installed the 1.2 gHz DownEast Microwave pre-amp.
Removed the two meter amplifier for service.
Ernie W6KAP
July 1, 2008 CENTOS 5.2 Update
CENTOS 5.2 was successfully installed. No issues encountered.
June 13, 2008 W6DHS A installed
KB6JST and W6KAP install the new 1.2GHz DV module & duplexer. The system is running barefoot on the same tri-band antenna as UHF.
10Watts output. K6NCR is able to work it from Rancho Cordova on his base station with 1 watt. KB6JST is able to work it fine with 10 watts in Elk Grove mobile. K6BIV is able to barely hear it from Pittsburg and cannot get in. A preamp is on order from DownEast microwave. Due July 15th.
Further testing will commence once it is installed. Unit is on 1284.500 -12MHz DV.
Power was lost at DHS due to the elctra fire. DHS was without power for 27 hours, batteries died at 24hrs.
Service was restored Saturday 7pm pdt.
June 7, 2008
Doug, K6HLE, and I just tested the W6DHS 2 meter REPEATER on its new frequency, 144.96 -.400. The test consisted of using a 0 dbd reference antenna at K6HLE's house in Folsom and transmitting known level signals into the repeater, reducing power using Doug's collection of attenuators until the signal started to exhibit error correction. The point at which error correction could be noticed with 100% intelligibility will be called low% BER, and the point at which error correction made the signal unintelligible will be called high% BER. The signal level was confirmed using HP test equipment. The low% BER level was then entered into the Radio Mobile RF link program to determine what level of signal was expected at W6DHS for that power level and the parameters of the installations on both ends of the path. Here are the results
Transmit power Attenuation low%BER Attenuation high% BER Actual measured output low%BER path distance path condition
0.5 watts 21 db 23db 3.6 milliwatts 36 miles single 18 db obstruction
Radio Mobile projected a signal level of .205 uv at W6DHS at the low%BER. Applying the additional 2db attenuation for the high%BER would indicate that the receiver is starting to decode in the area of .14uv, and is intelligible with noticable error correction in the area of .17uv.
The same test was done on the UHF Repeater.
Transmit Power Attenuation low%BER Attenuation high%BER Actual measured output low%BER
0.5 watts 0 db 1 db .5 watts
Radio Mobile projected a signal level of .233uv at W6DHS at the low %BER.
The difference between the two modules was primarily due to path loss at 440mHz and a lower gain 440 antenna being used at the W6DHS end of the path. The tests are somewhat relative as they rely on the anticipated coax loss and antenna gains rather than actual measurements, but the result is that both systems are exceeding what would be expected of a high performance repeater at a site with a low noise floor. The tests confirmed there was no de-sense in either system, as the range between high%BER and Loss of Signal would have been greater if de-sense was present.
After I reinstalled the duplexer I measured 42 watts out of the duplexer. Further investigation revealed that the 125 watt amplifier was only putting out 63 watts. The module was putting out 22 watts. It appears that the high level of activity on the new reflectors may have impacted the amplifier. Further follow-up is needed.
Ernie, W6KAP
June 6, 2008 Duplexer taken to Telewave in San Jose for alignment. Capacitors were replaced in the the tx side to allow for narrow spacing. DHS C was put back into service at about 6pm.